26 January 2016

Reading Schedule for God's Politics

A few weeks ago I shared that I will lead a special Lenten study at Custer Road beginning February 10. As we have a presidential election this year-- the Iowa caucuses are next Monday -- it seems like everyone is wondering how Christians will vote (as if we all vote for the same person). Donald Trump just tweeted this:

Or check this out:

(No, I am not endorsing Donald Trump; these just showed up in my timeline as I was writing this.)

Rev Jim Wallis wrote God's Politics nearly a decade ago, but the relationship between politics and faith is as vital as ever. So let's discuss it. Not in a way to endorse one candidate or another; but to understand better how our faith speaks to the issues of the day. Here's an outline-- we'll just go with how Wallis ordered the book:

Feb 10 Part I Changing the Wind: Take Back the Faith/A Lack of Vision/Is There a Politics of God?

Feb 17 Part II Moving Beyond the Politics of Complaint: Protest is Good; Alternatives Are Better/How Should Your Faith Influence Your Politics?/Prophetic Politics

Feb 24 Part III Spiritual Values and International Relations: Be Not Afraid/Not a Just War/Dangerous Religion/Blessed Are the Peacemakers/Against Impossible Odds/Micah's Vision for National and Global Security

March 2 (the day after the Texas primaries) Part IV Spiritual Values and Economic Justice: The Poor You Will Always Have with You?/Poor People Are Trapped-- in the Debate about Poverty/Isaiah's Platform/Amos and Enron/The Tipping Point

March 9 Spring Break; no class

March 16 Part V Spiritual Values And Social Issues: A Consistent Ethic of Life/Truth Telling About Race/The Ties That Bond

March 23 Part VI Spiritual Values and Social Change: The Critical Choice/We Are the Ones We've Been Waiting For

You can buy a copy of God's Politics here. Register for the class (no charge) here.

11 January 2016

Miscarriages of Justice

For four days, December 30-January 2, I was alone here in North Texas; Christy and the boys remained in Bay City for more time with family. I returned early to preside at a wedding and preach January 3 at Lectio. I knew of this extended time alone for a long time, so I made preparations for entertainment: HBO was going to re-air the entire Game of Thrones series. I binge-watched it last Spring before the new season began in April 2015, so I thought I would go through again. I watched Season 1, but then quit at the beginning of Season 2. I had heard of two new Netflix series I wanted to watch, Jessica Jones, a Marvel series, and the documentary Making a Murderer. I added both to my queue and began with Jessica Jones. I really enjoyed Daredevil from earlier in 2015, but, so far at least, JJ isn't up to that level. I've started and stopped a couple of times. I still have about an episode and a half to go. Regardless of how it ends, it would have been a much more effective experience if the series was 8 or 9 episodes, not 13.

Making a Murderer, on the other hand, is exhilarating. I could not stop watching it. I started the first episode the other night. Christy came in halfway into it and finished it, then fell asleep on the couch and went to bed during the second. I stayed up past midnight to get through four episodes. Netflix does not announce its viewership numbers, but my Twitter and Facebook feeds have been exploding for weeks about the series. It has to be in the millions of viewers, and still growing. It's the story of one family's ordeal at the hands of the justice system in Wisconsin over the past thirty years.

Steven Avery was convicted of a sexual assault in 1985. Despite his constant claims of innocence, he served 18 years until DNA evidence cleared him. He brought a wrongful prosecution lawsuit against his home county, and as that suit was ongoing, literally weeks after several in the Sheriff's department were deposed (2005), a woman went missing in the area. She could be traced to the Avery property on the last day anyone heard from her, and the county immediately suspected Steven Avery. His 16-year-old nephew was interviewed as part of the larger investigation, and after being led by investigators, admitted to killing the woman with his uncle. He has vacillated between the details offered in his confession and professing his innocence from the very beginning until today. Steven Avery proclaimed his innocence from the very beginning. Evidence offered at trial at best raises the suspicion that the Sheriff's department planted evidence and framed Avery because they absolutely believed he was guilty, but also as a response to the pending lawsuit. Both men are still in jail today, their repeated appeals denied.

"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." -- my favorite quote of Dr Martin Luther King, Jr

Next Monday is MLK's national holiday, but this morning the quote rings in my ears. It's been a common critique of the series that the entire caseload was not examined; that there is supporting evidence and circumstances that implicate both men. And it may be that they both are guilty (personally I do not think so, but that's just an opinion). What any casual observer could say after watching the show is, guilty or not, both men were denied rights guaranteed by the Constitution and by commonly accepted expectations of law enforcement and society in general:

  • Presumption of innocence by the criminal justice system
  • Competence of those whose are responsible for our protection and well being
  • An unbiased media, not one so easily manipulated by its appetite for details
This is not meant to be a Reddit commentary page on the details of the case-- you just have to watch it to get the depth of information and emotion. What I am interested in is how any of us, at any time, could be subject to the same ordeal Avery and his family have endured. He has spent more than 30 years of his life behind bars and has no possibility for parole. His nephew will be eligible for early release in 2048. I don't know how many times I thought, or sometimes yelled out loud, "How is this even possible?"

That question has been the theme of several shows and movies I have seen recently, as well as one I have not watched yet: The Big Short, Spotlight, (both reviewed here) and Concussion. Concussion (I have not seen it) challenges our trust in the NFL's ability to protect its players in the face of huge profits and our insatiable appetite for football; The Big Short questions our trust of the financial system; Spotlight casts doubt on the institution of the Church; and Making a Murderer has a similar impact on the judicial system. Where do we turn, where do we put our faith and trust, if these and other human institutions continually fail us?

(Of course a pastor is going to say Jesus Christ in answer to that question. Obviously.) But here's why:

Last night in Bible study we discussed the issue of salvation. Over and over I asked these questions of the group: "Do we need to be saved? From what?" "What does it say about the nature of God that God wants, and acts, to save us?" We read parables of Jesus and teachings of Paul from Luke 15 and Romans 5 that speak to the character of God, our human nature, and our need for salvation. Humanity lives in a constant struggle with sin-- on a personal level (individuals sins, like greed, lying, adultery, etc.), but also on a communal level-- what we think of as institutional sin: racism, economic injustice, etc. These movies and shows speak to our fear that our societal systems are rigged against the poor, the outcast, those without power. This is where the #BlackLivesMatter movement becomes part of the conversation.

I said above the obvious answer to these questions is "Jesus Christ," but if that is the answer it cannot be offered as a way to "check out" from the suffering of others-- instead it is an invitation to partner with them, and God, to overcome. As persons of faith, we must challenge these unjust human systems. We must work to alleviate persons who suffer when the institutions we are taught in civics class to trust limit or deny human freedom and hurt those they should protect. Just the other day I was re-reading a sermon from the book Just Preaching, edited by Andre Resner, which I used during my doctoral work on preaching from the news. It's called "Tikum Olam: Mending the World," by Rabbi Charles A. Kroloff. He wrote the sermon twenty years ago when Congress was debating cutting government aid to poor families. Toward the end, Rabbi Kroloff offers two central ideas in liberal Jewish and Christian thought ("liberal" in the sense of challenging unjust societal structures):

"One, that God created a world which is imperfect. Two, that we are partners with God in improving the world. In Hebrew, we use a compelling phrase to describe the purpose of that partnership: tikun olam, which means 'mending the world.' God seems to have left a lot of important tasks for us to do. That is our purpose on earth-- to help finish the job God began" (103).

By the final couple of episodes of Making a Murderer, I was eager to find out what had happened: what missing piece of evidence exonerated Avery and his nephew? What unexpected legal argument compelled the courts to grant new trials for both? And I was frustrated, heartbroken, to hear all of those attorneys who had tried to help across thirty years say they were still waiting. Those guys are still in prison, and they may be for many years to come. That is not okay, and it is not just. As I said, they may be guilty-- but they at least deserve the chance to argue that their cases were heard fairly and without obvious bias and coercion.

So we must wait, not just for this terrible episode in Wisconsin, but anywhere folk suffer injustice. In the meantime, we maintain our identity as people who belong to the Lord. In Lectio worship yesterday we remembered our baptisms, the outward sign of God's promised salvation, and heard these words read aloud: "Don't fear, I have redeemed you; I have called you by name; you are mine. When you pass through the waters, I will be with you; when through the rivers, they won't sweep over you. When you walk through the fire, you won't be scorched and flame won't burn you (Isaiah 43:1-2).

05 January 2016

God's Politics-- a Study for Lent

In case you haven’t noticed, 2016 is an election year. To illustrate how long our electoral process takes, several Republicans and Democrats quit the race for the White House more than a year before the election! It makes my head hurt. Any observer of our process, from the most plugged in political junkie to the one who votes only out of a sense of civic duty, would say our system is broken, if not toxic. And things only get more complicated when faith enters the equation.

But what if there was another way? What if we could learn to approach politics from a Christian, rather than a political, perspective? When I wrote my doctoral thesis several years ago, I focused on preaching on “hot button issues.” One of the best resources I incorporated was God’s Politics by Jim Wallis. In a non-threatening, non-hostile way, Wallis explores the relationship between politics and Christian faith, and I’d like to invite you join in the discussion during the Season of Lent.

“Sounds great,” you may say, “But what does it have to do with Lent?” Well, Lent is a 40-day time of spiritual preparation for the coming of Easter. Approaching politics specifically, and more generally the world in which we live, from an informed, Christian perspective is a spiritual discipline. A standard not easily met by CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, or whatever other news outlet available to us. Plus, the book addresses specific issues that have a spiritual element embedded to them: war, poverty, the environment, among others.

So I invite you to join me for a grown-up, mature exploration of the complicated relationship between religion and politics. It’s a free class, but you’ll need to bring a Bible and a copy of the book. You can pick up God’s Politics on the cheap anywhere-- I bought a large type paperback at Half Price for $8; others downloaded a digital copy for $2. We’ll meet Wednesday evenings during Lent, beginning February 10, 7:15-8:45 p.m. Our study will follow the weekly Lenten worship services in the Chapel.